When companies have clear visibility regarding their emissions, they can identify opportunities to improve efficiency, reduce waste, and lower their environmental impact. Sometimes, the biggest changes begin with something simple: accurately measuring and understanding where you are today.
Mainak Mukherjee, our next pathbreaker, Part of SLB’s Digital Sustainability team, contributes to the development of digital sustainability solutions that help companies measure, manage, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enabling data-driven progress toward decarbonization.
Mainak talks to Shyam Krishnamurthy from The Interview Portal about moving into Energy Consulting after his PhD, his entire career connected by a common theme: contributing to the global energy transition from different perspectives through technology development, business strategy, and scientific evidence.
For students, embrace continuous learning. The world is changing quickly, and many of the jobs that exist today did not even exist fifteen years ago. Your greatest advantage will be your ability to learn, adapt, and grow with change.
Mainak, Tell us about your background.
Whenever someone asks about my background, I like to begin with a simple thought: ‘Big dreams don’t always begin in big cities’.
I grew up in Asansol, an industrial city in West Bengal, India. As a child, I was far more interested in sports than academics. I wasn’t the student who had every career milestone mapped out or knew exactly what I wanted to become. Yet, beneath that lighthearted childhood, my curiosity quietly kept growing. Questions like ‘How does this machine work?’ or ‘How do cars and trains move?’ were always lingering in the back of my mind.
The biggest influences on my journey have been my parents. Neither of them came from an engineering or scientific background, but they firmly believed that education could create opportunities and transform lives. More importantly, they taught me values that have guided me during every stage of my journey. Those lessons have proven far more enduring than any textbook.
Looking back, I realize that curiosity mattered much more than having all the answers. It wasn’t about knowing everything, it was about being willing to ask questions, observe, listen to, explore new ideas, and keep learning. That mindset molded how I approach challenges, whether in academics, research, or life.
Interestingly, this perspective is progressively reflected in what employer’s value today. According to the ‘World Economic Forum’s: Future of Jobs Report 2025’, skills such as curiosity, analytical thinking, resilience, and lifelong learning rank among the most important qualities for the future workforce often carrying as much weight as technical expertise. In a rapidly changing world, the ability to learn, adapt, and stay curious is becoming one of the greatest competitive advantages.
What did you study?
My formal education began in 1995 at St. Patrick’s Higher Secondary School, Asansol, one of the oldest and most prestigious schools in eastern India, with a rich legacy spanning more than 135 years. It was here that I did kindergarten to class 12, (ISC) graduating with a major in science in 2008. Looking back, this phase laid the foundation for my analytical thinking more than the marks I got which were typically run-of-the-mill, but more importantly, it nurtured a growing curiosity about how the world around me worked.
Honestly, my rank for engineering entrance wasn’t good enough to break into few of the top-tier universities, in India. Nevertheless, driven by that curiosity and fascination with technologies I decided to pursue a bachelor’s degree (B.E) in mechanical engineering at the Nagpur University. As an 18-year-old, into an engineering program, this phase initially seemed overwhelming, but transformative, as my childhood questions gave way to structured problem-solving. I began learning the principles behind machines, energy systems, manufacturing systems, and engineering design, though my real education extended far beyond the classroom.
Through internships, industrial visits, and field training, I witnessed engineering in action. Concepts that once existed only in textbooks suddenly came alive on factory floors. Watching industrial operations firsthand helped me bridge the gap between theory and practice, reinforcing a lesson that has stayed with me ever since: seeing is believing. Those experiences taught me that the true value of engineering lies not just in understanding concepts, but in applying them to solve real-world challenges. As my academic journey progressed, one question increasingly captured my attention:
‘How can we produce the energy the world needs without compromising the health of our planet?’
Later, I decided to pursue a Master’s (M. Tech) degree in Energy Systems at the University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES), Dehradun India. This is where, I explored energy technologies, energy efficiency, sustainability, and cleaner energy systems. For the first time, I began to appreciate that engineering is not only about building better machines, but also about designing solutions that create a more sustainable future.
What were some of the influences that led you to such an offbeat, unconventional and unique career in Energy Engineering?
Choosing the present career wasn’t the result of a single defining moment. Instead, it was shaped by a series of experiences that gradually pointed me in the same direction. During my engineering studies, I came to appreciate a simple yet profound reality: everything around us depends on energy. The electricity that powers our homes, the transportation systems that connect people, the industries that manufacture essential goods, the hospitals that save lives, and even the digital technologies we rely on every day are driven by energy.
At the same time, I began to understand the environmental cost of meeting the world’s growing energy demands. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), the energy sector is responsible for approximately three-quarters of global greenhouse gas emissions, making it one of the most critical areas for climate action. This realization led me to ask an important question:
Can engineering become part of the solution rather than part of the problem? The answer to that question has guided my career ever since.
Three experiences had the greatest influence on my decision. First, I was fortunate to learn from inspiring teachers and mentors who encouraged me to question assumptions, think critically, and remain curious. Second, my research during my PhD and postdoctoral work introduced me to advanced energy systems particularly in the advancements of oil and gas technologies and demonstrated how scientific innovation can contribute to solving industrial and environmental challenges. Finally, witnessing the growing impacts of climate change reinforced the urgency of developing cleaner, more sustainable technologies for future generations. These experiences transformed engineering from a profession into a purpose. Today, that purpose continues to drive my work: helping industries become cleaner, smarter, and more sustainable through research, innovation, and the responsible application of engineering.
Mainak, why did you choose UPES for masters instead of abroad?
To be honest, studying abroad was my first preference. After completing my bachelor’s degree, I applied to several master’s and integrated MS–PhD options in countries like the US and Canada. While I received positive responses from some universities, I couldn’t secure a fully funded position or a scholarship that covered my tuition fees and living expenses. Since I didn’t have the personal financial resources to fund an overseas education, pursuing that option wasn’t feasible at the time.
Later, I chose UPES because it had a strong curriculum in my preferred field of study ‘energy systems’, offered excellent research opportunities, and had experienced faculty working in areas that interested me. Another factor was that UPES had collaborations and academic connections with several foreign universities, which gave students exposure to international research and opportunities for future higher studies.
Also, during the period I was able to carry out research which focused on lean manufacturing as a means of improving energy utilization in micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) clusters in Dehradun and Haridwar in Uttarakhand. This experience introduced me to industrial energy efficiency and demonstrated how operational improvements can deliver both economic and environmental benefits. It also allowed me to build a solid academic and research foundation while managing costs.
How did you get your first break?
People often assume that careers change because of one lucky opportunity. My experience was different. The opportunity came ‘after years of preparation, and rejections’.
During my master’s, I focused less on chasing job titles and more on building knowledge, developing practical skills, and gaining meaningful experience. I immersed myself in research projects, collaborated with faculty and peers, published my work, and embraced every opportunity to learn. Looking back, I realize that each of these experiences was quietly shaping my professional profile long before I received my first academic appointment.
After completing my master’s degree, I was offered the opportunity to join UPES as an ‘Assistant Professor’. It was an exciting transition from being a student to becoming an educator and researcher. At UPES, I taught undergraduate and postgraduate engineering students while actively contributing to research projects in areas such as ‘Bioenergy’ ‘Thermodynamics’ and ‘Thermal energy systems.’ Teaching challenged me to deepen my own understanding, because explaining complex concepts clearly required understanding them yourself. At the same time, working on research projects strengthened my ability to investigate real-world engineering problems and collaborate with multidisciplinary teams.
This experience marked an important milestone in my career. It reinforced that learning does not end with a degree; in many ways, it is only the beginning. Teaching, conducting research, and mentoring students all became opportunities to continue growing as both an engineer and a lifelong learner.
One lesson has stayed with me throughout my career: “Luck becomes far more meaningful when preparation meets opportunity.”
Every skill you develop, every project you undertake, every paper you write, and every challenge you embrace quietly prepares you for opportunities that may not yet be visible. When those opportunities finally arrive, preparation is what allows you to recognize them and make the most of them.
Can you explain why you decided to do a PhD after masters, which is a major decision? Why did you choose France? Did you get any scholarship?
During my master’s, I realized that I enjoyed research much more than I had expected. I liked solving open-ended problems, reading scientific literature, and working on projects where I could contribute something new rather than simply applying existing knowledge. A PhD seemed like a natural path. It wasn’t a decision I made overnight, it evolved through my master’s and academic experience.
Amidst several PhD applications I was making globally, France stood out as a relevant option because of its strong research ecosystem, particularly in engineering and clean energy technologies. Many French universities and research institutes collaborate closely with industry, creating excellent opportunities for impactful, application-oriented research. This is when I joined the ‘Universite de Lorraine, Nancy France’.
Another major factor was my PhD advisors (Prof Dr Francois Lapicque and Dr. Caroline Bonnet). They were vastly experienced, internationally recognized in the field, and had an excellent track record of research and mentoring students. I felt confident that I would receive the right guidance and be challenged as well, to grow as an independent researcher.
In addition, France offers a multicultural environment, making it an attractive destination for international researchers. Looking back, choosing France gave me the opportunity to work at the forefront of fuel cell research while learning in an internationally collaborative and intellectually stimulating environment
Moreso, I received a funded PhD position sponsored by the Universite de Lorraine. It covered my tuition fees and provided a monthly stipend throughout the PhD duration, which allowed me to focus fully on my research.
Can you explain the problem statement of your PhD? You mention LRGP. Was it an industrial PhD?
My PhD at Lorraine took me into the world of hydrogen fuel cells, where I worked at the intersection of mechanical, chemical, and electrochemical engineering.
It mainly focused on improving the performance of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. While fuel cells are considered one of the promising clean energy technologies, their widespread adoption is still limited by challenges such as gas transport effectiveness, degradation of materials, reduced efficiency over time, and high costs.
The global PEM fuel cell materials market was estimated at US$ 1.5 billion in 2025 and is forecasted to grow significantly, reaching approximately US$ 135.6 billion by 2036. This growth reflects a robust compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 50.6% during the forecasted period from 2026 to 2036.
The research aimed to better understand the gas transport phenomena inside fuel cells, particularly under real operating conditions. By combining experiments with advanced characterization techniques and modelling, I investigated why components deteriorate and how we can design more durable fuel cells (link to my PhD paper). The PhD had a strong industrial dimension based out of LRGP (Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés), a CNRS research laboratory in Nancy, France. Nonetheless my project was also focused on various PEM fuel cell materials such as (Gas diffusion layers or GDLs, Bi-polar plate configurations for effective for gas transport phenomena) from industrial manufacturers. The long-term goal was to help develop fuel cells that last longer, perform more efficiently, and become more commercially viable for applications such as transportation and stationary power generation.
Fuel Cells are the future. So can you talk about your research for students?
“Fuel cells are the future”- can certainly be a subjective opinion. Nonetheless, despite several challenges, I’m happy to see the ‘Fuel cell and hydrogen energy’ space evolving.
I like to explain fuel cells using a simple analogy.
Think of a fuel cell as a battery that never needs recharging, as long as it is continuously supplied with hydrogen and oxygen. Instead of storing energy like a conventional battery, it converts chemical energy directly into electricity, producing only water and heat as by-products. This makes fuel cells an attractive clean-energy technology (see Figure 1 below).
Figure 1. Simplified image of expanded PEMFC, the stack and the application in an electric vehicle
For ‘The Interview Portal’ by © Mukherjee M., 2026, using MS PowerPoint
However, there are challenges: one of them being over time, the materials inside the fuel cell gradually wear out, much like how a car engine experiences wear after years of use. This degradation reduces efficiency and shortens the lifetime of the system, making fuel cells more expensive.
My research focused on understanding exactly why this degradation occurs. We performed experiments under different operating conditions, analyzed how the materials change at the microscopic level, and developed models to predict their long-term behavior. These insights from this work are now helping engineers design fuel cells that are more reliable, more durable, and ultimately more affordable.
If fuel cells can last significantly longer while maintaining high performance, they become a much more practical solution for hydrogen-powered vehicles, renewable energy storage, and clean power generation.
The experience exposed to me how solving complex energy challenges often requires integrating knowledge from multiple disciplines rather than relying on a single area of expertise.
Having researched hydrogen almost nine years ago in its formative stages, it’s incredibly rewarding to see it evolve from lab-scale experiments to practical, real-world applications. One practical example is the very recent launch of India’s first hydrogen train, about which I had the privilege of sharing my viewpoints to Press Trust of India, which was later picked up by MSN News, The Economic Times etc. Linked here,
In 2020 December, I finished my PhD in Process and Energy Engineering. Thanks to my doctoral advisors Prof Dr. Francois Lapicque and Prof Dr. Caroline Bonnet, and exceptional colleagues, my doctoral journey was both intellectually demanding and deeply rewarding. It involved rigorous coursework, complex experiments, collaboration with multidisciplinary teams, and close engagement with industrial research problems.
I often, now, talk about one common mistaken belief, and it can be a subjective one as well, that a PhD is simply about conducting laboratory experiments, publishing papers, undertaking coursework and earning a degree. While those are certainly important aspects, however many doctoral programs/research, particularly those conducted in collaboration with industry, focus on solving industry specific research problems, high-impact engineering problems with perceptible societal and industrial relevance. It is a full-fledged working experience in my opinion, beyond the classical definition of PhD. My time in France taught me not only how to conduct research, but also how to think critically, align with industrial needs, navigate uncertainty, collaborate across disciplines, and transform scientific ideas into solutions with tangible impact.
Reflecting on my educational journey, one lesson stands out above all others: Engineering is not just about building machines or developing new technologies. At its core, it is about improving people’s lives, advancing society, and creating a more sustainable future.
After your PhD you worked in consulting? Why was that what did you do?
Yes, it was a conscious decision, although it wasn’t something I had planned from the very beginning of my PhD. Throughout my doctoral research, I was working on hydrogen fuel cells and clean energy technologies, so sustainability and decarbonization had already become areas I was passionate about.
Towards the end of my PhD, I started exploring how I could apply my research skills to broader, real-world challenges. Co-incidentally, this was also the time when a lot of ‘Hydrogen Energy’ missions and projects were incepted globally including the National Hydrogen Mission, India 2021. Hence consulting appealed to me because it offered the opportunity to work across different sectors and contribute to organizations’ decarbonization and energy transition, and hydrogen strategies. It allowed me to bridge the gap between cutting-edge technology and practical business implementation.
I have had a couple stints at consulting firms both in India (i) as a consultant at EY post PhD and then (ii) as a Manager at KPMG, after my postdoc. Within sustainability consulting, I learned how organizations make strategic decisions, balance commercial realities, and implement climate and sustainability initiatives.
Mainak, was your transition to consulting and decarbonization deliberate? How did you get your 1st job at E&Y after your PhD?
Post PhD, I actively searched for roles that valued both technical expertise and analytical problem-solving, and EY had opportunities that aligned well with my background at that point.
I tailored my CV to highlight the transferable skills I had developed during my PhD data analysis, structured problem solving, project management, stakeholder collaboration, and presenting complex ideas to different audiences. During the interviews, I focused not only on my research but also on how those skills could help solve business challenges.
I think what helped me stand out was demonstrating that a PhD is much more than technical research. It teaches you how to tackle ambiguous problems, learn quickly, manage long-term projects independently, and communicate evidence-based recommendations qualities that are highly valued in consulting.
PhDs are well-suited to consulting because their strengths in analytical thinking, problem-solving, communication, critical inquiry, and independent research translate directly into helping organizations solve complex real-world challenges, which was reported by Dr Milio in a blog post London School of Economics
What made you think of doing a postdoc, when already in consulting, and what was your postdoc work about?
Again, it was a conscious decision. When the opportunity to join Stanford University came up, it was difficult to pass up. Stanford is one of the world’s leading research institutions, and the project aligned perfectly with my long-term interest in decarbonization and sustainability. I saw it as a unique opportunity to combine the strategic thinking I had developed in consulting with cutting-edge scientific research.
As a postdoctoral researcher at the Doerr School of Sustainability at Stanford University, and getting to work with my advisor Prof. Brandt, was a significant transformation point in my life. My focus widened towards quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from global oil and gas operations using digital scientific models. This work strengthened my understanding of emissions accounting, large-scale data analytics, and the scientific methods used to evaluate environmental impacts across complex energy systems. Furthermore, working along with brilliant scientists and graduate students my work involved analyzing large global datasets, developing and validating computational models, integrating information from multiple sources, and collaborating with an international team of researchers.
- One of my key projects involved using the Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator (OPGEE), a globally recognized life-cycle assessment model developed at Stanford, to quantify greenhouse gas emissions from oil and gas production across different regions and production systems. This helped identify the major emission sources and evaluate opportunities for reducing the carbon intensity of upstream operations.
- I also co-lead research on the greenhouse gas emissions associated with liquefied natural gas (LNG), analyzing emissions across the entire LNG value chain from production and liquefaction to transport and regasification. The work provided scientific insights into how LNG can contribute to energy security while highlighting where emissions reductions are needed to support climate goals. This pioneering work was later reported across global policy and media outlets, ,
We aimed to produce scientifically robust emissions estimates that could support better decision-making in the energy sector. Working at Stanford also exposed me to a highly interdisciplinary research environment, where experts in engineering, energy sciences, computer science, economics, and public policy worked together to solve complex climate challenges.
During my PhD, I focused on developing clean energy technologies through hydrogen fuel cells. In consulting, I learned how businesses make strategic decisions around energy transition. At Stanford, I gained expertise in measuring and quantifying emissions, which is fundamental for designing credible decarbonization strategies.
Looking back, I don’t see these as separate career moves. They are all connected by a common theme: contributing to the global energy transition from different perspectives through technology development, business strategy, and scientific evidence. Together, these experiences have given me a much broader understanding of how we can address climate and sustainability challenges.
What challenges did you face? How did you address them?
Every career has its share of challenges. Looking back, I realize that the obstacles I encountered became some of my greatest learning experiences.
Challenge 1: Stepping Into New Fields/roles
My journey began in mechanical engineering, but over time I transitioned into sustainability, clean energy research, consulting, digital technologies, and carbon accounting. Each move required me to learn entirely new concepts, tools, and ways of thinking. At first, entering unfamiliar domains felt intimidating. There was always more to learn than I already knew. Instead of worrying about the gaps in my knowledge, I focused on making steady progress learning one concept, one project, and one experience at a time.
Challenge 2: Adapting to New Countries and Cultures
Studying and working in France and the United States brought opportunities that I had once only imagined. Along with those opportunities came the challenge of adapting to different cultures, languages, academic environments, and professional expectations. The transition was not always easy. Living far from home and navigating unfamiliar ways of working often pushed me outside my comfort zone. However, those experiences taught me resilience, adaptability, and the importance of embracing diverse perspectives. Collaborating with people from different cultures broadened not only my technical understanding but also my appreciation for different ways of thinking and solving problems. It made me a better engineer, a better researcher, and, more importantly, a more empathetic person.
Challenge 3: Embracing Uncertainty
Like many professionals, I didn’t always know what my next career step would be. There were moments when the future seemed uncertain and the path ahead wasn’t clearly defined. Over time, I learned that it is impossible to predict every opportunity or every challenge. Instead of trying to control the future, I focused on something I could control by becoming a little better each year learning new skills, taking on meaningful work, and remaining open to new possibilities. Looking back, I can see that every challenge, every transition, and every period of uncertainty was preparing me for the next stage of my journey.
If there is one lesson that connects all these experiences, it is this: “Growth rarely happens within our comfort zone”. It happens when we are willing to learn something unfamiliar, adapt to new environments, and embrace uncertainty with curiosity instead of fear. Though I must admit that this remains a subjective thought.
What do you do now?
I currently work at SLB, a global energy technology company, where I help develop solutions for carbon management.
One of the key questions we help companies answer is: ‘How much carbon is emitted?’
Once companies have that information, they can identify where emissions are highest and prioritize the areas that will have the greatest impact on reducing them. I often explain it using an analogy. Imagine you’re trying to improve your exam results. If you don’t know which subjects you performed poorly in, it’s difficult to know where to focus your effort. Carbon management works the same way you ‘measure first, then improve’. Accurate measurement provides the foundation for making informed decisions and driving meaningful reductions in emissions.
Today, at SLB, I contribute to the development of digital sustainability solutions that help companies measure, manage, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enabling data-driven progress toward decarbonization.
Looking back, every stage of my journey taught me something unique:
- Engineering taught me how systems work.
- Research taught me how to ask better questions.
- Consulting taught me how organizations solve complex problems.
- Technology taught me how to scale solutions and create real-world impact.
None of these experiences were isolated, and none was wasted. Together, they shaped the way I think today: combining engineering, research, sustainability, and digital innovation to solve problems that matter. My career has never been defined by a single discipline; it has been driven by curiosity, continuous learning, and the belief that meaningful innovation often happens at the intersection of different fie
From my experience, technical knowledge is essential, but it isn’t enough. Many of the challenges we solve require working across different disciplines and translating complex technical information into insights that customers can act on. These skills also align with what the World Economic Forum identifies as some of the fastest-growing workplace capabilities, including analytical thinking, resilience, AI literacy, and continuous learning.
Technology is evolving rapidly, and the tools we use today will continue to change. That’s why I believe one of the most valuable skills anyone can develop is ‘learning how to learn’.
What does a typical day look like?
One of the things I enjoy most about my role is that no two days are the same. On any given day, I might be collaborating with colleagues across global teams, analyzing data, solving technical challenges, meeting with customers to understand their sustainability goals, keeping up to date with evolving regulations, or exploring new digital technologies that can improve the way we work.
That variety is what makes the role so rewarding. It gives me the opportunity to continuously learn, work with people from different backgrounds, and apply both technical and problem-solving skills to real-world sustainability challenges.
What do you enjoy most?
What I find most rewarding is knowing that the work we do can create real-world impact. Even small improvements to industrial processes can lead to significant reductions in carbon emissions when applied on a scale. Being able to use technology and data to help companies make more sustainable decisions is something I find both challenging and meaningful.
It’s rewarding to work on solutions that not only deliver value for businesses but also contribute to broader sustainability goals. Knowing that my work can help support both commercial success and environmental responsibility gives me a strong sense of purpose.
How does your work benefit society?
Every one of us depends on energy in our daily lives. The challenge is finding ways to produce and use it more responsibly. According to the United Nations, achieving global climate goals requires rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions across all industries. A critical first step in achieving this is having accurate information because better measurement leads to better decisions.
When companies understand where their emissions are generated, they can identify opportunities to improve efficiency, reduce waste, and lower their environmental impact. Sometimes, the biggest changes begin with something simple: accurately measuring and understanding where you are today. Once you have that visibility, you can make smarter decisions and take meaningful action toward a more sustainable future.
Tell us about a memorable work experience.
One project that fundamentally changed how I think about sustainability was my work on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) at Stanford with my advisor/Guru Professor Brandt.
Before that experience, I believed that the environmental impact of technology was mainly determined by how it is operated. Through LCA, I learned something much more profound: every product has a story. A product’s environmental footprint begins long before it is used. It includes the extraction of raw materials, manufacturing, transportation, operation, and ultimately what happens at the end of its life through reuse or recycling.
My research with Professor Brandt’s led to two major milestones.
- First, we co-developed with a team of exceptional scientists and researchers “The Archie initiative”, a pioneering data platform that provides insights into the carbon intensity of oil-producing fields around the world. This was the very first of its kind.
- Second, my first publication in the Nature Portfolio, where we estimated the carbon intensity of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United States to 30 different countries globally. This research was covered by Yahoo News Germany and referenced by several other media outlets.
What advice would you give students?
If I could leave you with a few thoughts, they would be these.
First, stay curious. The ability to ask good questions is often more valuable than simply knowing the answers. The people who continue asking “why” are the ones who continue learning and growing throughout their lives.
Second, don’t worry if you don’t have everything planned out. Very few people do. Careers are rarely built through one perfect decision, they develop through a series of choices, experiences, and opportunities. Focus on building skills and staying open to new possibilities.
Third, don’t be afraid of failure or setbacks. This is something I have learned through my own journey. Along the way, I have faced rejections, unexpected challenges, and moments when things did not go well. It’s life, and that is the course it follows, just accept and rework. At the time, those experiences were difficult, but they taught me some of the most valuable lessons. Glad to accept even now that I’m still failing, getting rejected, and honestly it feels like a relatively lesser pain now.
Fourth, build skills, not just grades. Knowledge is important because it opens doors, but skills such as communication, teamwork, creativity, adaptability, and integrity help you make an impact once you walk through them.
Finally, embrace continuous learning. The world is changing quickly, and many of the jobs that exist today did not even exist fifteen years ago. Your greatest advantage will be your ability to learn, adapt, and grow with change.
What are your future plans?
Looking ahead, I hope to continue working at the intersection of engineering, sustainability, and digital technology. The world is moving toward cleaner energy systems, smarter industries, and more data-driven decision-making. According to the International Energy Agency, achieving global net-zero goals will require unprecedented levels of innovation, collaboration, and skilled professionals across science, engineering, and technology.
I hope to contribute to this transition by developing practical solutions that help industries reduce emissions while continuing to deliver the energy and products that society depends on. However, my ambitions extend beyond my professional work. I also want to inspire more young people to see science and engineering as powerful tools for creating positive change.